San Jose, California: Apple company Inc tried to convince U.S. jurors to keep unchanged a ancient judgment it won against New samsung Electronic devices Co Ltd last season, while the Japanese company suggested that Apple company has embellished its accidents from certain offenses.
At ending justifications on Wednesday in a San Jose, Florida federal assess, Apple company lawyer Harold McElhinny told jurors that their judgment would be important for defending American companies and keeping Rubber Valley's advancement economic system.
However, New samsung lawyer Bill Cost said Apple company blatantly embellished how important the five patents at test actually are to the iPhone's value.
Apple is involved in international certain lawsuits against competitors like New samsung, a test fight released by Apple's famous cofounder Bob Tasks before his loss of life. The test fight decorative mirrors competition between management in the smart phone and product markets.
Last season, Apple company was granted over $1 billion dollars after it assured a assess that New samsung duplicated various iPhone features - like using your fingertips to touch and zoom capability on the display - along with style hits like the cell cell phone's flat, black glass display.
That judgment was a high point in Apple's legal war on Google Android working system os, which New samsung uses on its mobile phones.
U.S. Region Judge Hannah Koh consequently refused Apple's bid for a lasting sales ban against several New samsung items, but in a win for Apple company, a U.S. is attractive assess this 7 days requested Koh to reevaluate that judgment.
When it came to loss, Koh upheld about $600 thousand of last seasons judgment but requested a retrial on the rest, judgment that the previous assess had created some mistakes in its computations.
During the retrial, which has been unfolding over the past 7 days, Apple company asked the assess to prize $379.8 thousand, while New samsung suggested that it should have to pay $52.7 thousand.
In assess on Wednesday, Apple company lawyers Bill Lee and McElhinny advised the six-woman, two-man assess to focus on inner New samsung records, especially since no mature New samsung professionals showed up on the observe stand.
"Witnesses forget, or in the case of New samsung here, witnesses don't appear," Lee said.
McElhinny added that New samsung was trying to pay a tiny portion of the $3.5 billion dollars in U.S. income it created from infringing items. "That's incredible," he said.
Samsung's Cost said New samsung is willing to pay what the law requirements. But New samsung should not be forced to overcompensate Apple company for style hits that any opponent should be permitted to integrate, he said.
"Apple doesn't own wonderful and attractive," Cost said, adding: "What they're saying is, in the market, rights is just us."
The assess is planned to begin deliberating later on Wednesday.
At ending justifications on Wednesday in a San Jose, Florida federal assess, Apple company lawyer Harold McElhinny told jurors that their judgment would be important for defending American companies and keeping Rubber Valley's advancement economic system.
However, New samsung lawyer Bill Cost said Apple company blatantly embellished how important the five patents at test actually are to the iPhone's value.
Apple is involved in international certain lawsuits against competitors like New samsung, a test fight released by Apple's famous cofounder Bob Tasks before his loss of life. The test fight decorative mirrors competition between management in the smart phone and product markets.
Last season, Apple company was granted over $1 billion dollars after it assured a assess that New samsung duplicated various iPhone features - like using your fingertips to touch and zoom capability on the display - along with style hits like the cell cell phone's flat, black glass display.
That judgment was a high point in Apple's legal war on Google Android working system os, which New samsung uses on its mobile phones.
U.S. Region Judge Hannah Koh consequently refused Apple's bid for a lasting sales ban against several New samsung items, but in a win for Apple company, a U.S. is attractive assess this 7 days requested Koh to reevaluate that judgment.
When it came to loss, Koh upheld about $600 thousand of last seasons judgment but requested a retrial on the rest, judgment that the previous assess had created some mistakes in its computations.
During the retrial, which has been unfolding over the past 7 days, Apple company asked the assess to prize $379.8 thousand, while New samsung suggested that it should have to pay $52.7 thousand.
In assess on Wednesday, Apple company lawyers Bill Lee and McElhinny advised the six-woman, two-man assess to focus on inner New samsung records, especially since no mature New samsung professionals showed up on the observe stand.
"Witnesses forget, or in the case of New samsung here, witnesses don't appear," Lee said.
McElhinny added that New samsung was trying to pay a tiny portion of the $3.5 billion dollars in U.S. income it created from infringing items. "That's incredible," he said.
Samsung's Cost said New samsung is willing to pay what the law requirements. But New samsung should not be forced to overcompensate Apple company for style hits that any opponent should be permitted to integrate, he said.
"Apple doesn't own wonderful and attractive," Cost said, adding: "What they're saying is, in the market, rights is just us."
The assess is planned to begin deliberating later on Wednesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment